Sanden v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Sundermann, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, the city of Cincinnati (“the city”), appeals from the trial court’s entry denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment to its former employee, plaintiff-appellee Ronald Sanden, Jr., on his workers’ compensation claim for posttraumatic stress disorder.
{¶ 2} Sanden began employment as a police officer with the city on June 9, 1996. In October 1997, Sanden was finishing his shift when he saw Officers Daniel Pope and Ronald Jeter. Sanden handed them an arrest warrant for a suspect named Davenport, whom he had been unable to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Koos v. Central Ohio Cellular, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
- McCrone v. Bank One Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. Baryak v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State ex rel. Baryak v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019