Payne v. Volkman
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.
The trial court sustained the demurrer upon two principal grounds: (1st) that it did not appear from the complaint that the plaintiffs were licensed real-estate brokers under sub. (5), sec. 1636 — 225, Stats, (now ch. 136), and are therefore not entitled to collect a commission as such; (2d) that it appears upon the face of the complaint and upon the statements made by counsel that the corporation was not authorized to transact business because of its failure to comply with sec. 1773, which provides:
“No such corporation shall transact business with any others than its members until at least…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- De Wit v. LanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Sixta v. Ontonagon Valley Land Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by31 opinions
- Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. ColangeloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
- Thorpe v. CarteCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Frankenthal v. Wisconsin Real Estate Brokers' BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Gregory v. RoedenbeckTexas Supreme Court · 1943
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.