Forest Conservation Council v. Espy
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION
RYAN, Senior District Judge.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Now before the court in the above-entitled matter is the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction Under the Endangered Species Act, filed on May 28, 1993. Also before the court are plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on June 30, 1993, and July 2,1993, respectively. In addition, Intervenor/Cross-Claimant Boise Cascade Corporation (“Boise Cascade”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Swanson v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Swanson v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Southwest Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Silver v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
- Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.