Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
The United States Forest Service proposed eight timber sales in the Upper Sunday Creek Watershed region of the Kootenai National Forest in northwest Montana. The environmental impact statement it prepared *757in anticipation of the sales evaluated the project’s impact on a number of “sensitive species” living in that region. Plaintiffs, a number of environmental groups, challenged the sale first in administrative hearings and ultimately in district court, claiming that the Service’s analysis of the sale’s impact on seven species — the lynx, boreal owl,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Robertson v. Methow Valley Citizens CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kleppe v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Curry v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Sierra Club v. GlickmanDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1997
- Inland Empire Public Lands Council v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2002
- Klamath-Siskiyou Wildlands Center v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.