Legal Opinion
Silver v. Babbitt
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 24, 1995No. Civ. 94-337 PHX CAM, Civ. 94-1610 PHX CAMPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MUECKE, District Judge.
Having considered ail of the pleadings 1 relevant to the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and the defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment, the court concludes as follows:
Background
Plaintiffs seek a determination that the United States Forest Service [USFS] and Bureau of Indian Affairs [BIA] violated section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), when they failed to consult with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS] about programmatic land management plans that affect the threatened Mexican spotted owl and its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Greenpeace v. National Marine Fisheries ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2000
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.