Legal Opinion
Ohio State Tie & Timber, Inc. v. Paris Lumber Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 30, 1982No. 82AP-211PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.
Defendants, Paris Lumber Company and its partners, appeal from a decision of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raise three assignments of error, as follows:
“1. The trial court erred in finding that the Defendants-Appellants had sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Ohio to warrant the exercise of personal jurisdiction over them in Ohio.
“2. The trial court erred in failing to hold an evidentiary hearing to resolve factual issues with respect to the existence and terms of an alleged settlement agreement.
“3. The trial court erred in finding that the parties had entered into a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Haluka v. BakerOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Universal Coach, Inc. v. New York City Transit Authority, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dayton Superior Corp. v. YanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Compuserve, Inc. v. TrionfoOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- General Acquisition, Inc. v. GenCorp Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1990
- Hammill Manufacturing Co. v. Quality Rubber Products, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.