Legal Opinion

Camp v. Oakland Mortgage & Finance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12905PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff instituted this action to recover the residue or balance of a loan fund remaining in defendant’s hands, the loan having been theretofore arranged for and negotiated by one George Phillips and wife to meet progress payments on certain improvement work undertaken by them. Plaintiff’s claim to this balance is founded upon what is described in the complaint as a “draft” drawn by Phillips and wife to the plaintiff’s order. It appears, however, that several other persons, including the assignee of Phillips and wife, had also made demand upon defendant for the two thousand…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Heinze v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Cassidy v. NortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  3. Youtz v. Farmers & Merchants' Natl. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  4. State ex rel. Weinstein Co. v. District Court of the First Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Beck v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Knoff v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Hellman Commercial Trust & Savings Bank v. AldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Chitwood v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Lincoln National Life Insurance v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. Sweeney v. McClaranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API