Legal Opinion
Youtz v. Farmers & Merchants' Natl. Bank
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 11, 1916No. Civ. No. 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
Defendant bank in September, 1913, had on deposit in the name of E. B. Youtz, wife of Joshua E. Youtz, the sum of $2,704.83. One Gara Williams commenced an action in the superior court against Joshua E. Youtz in which action judgment was sought in the sum of eleven thousand dollars on promissory notes. A writ of attachment was served upon the defendant bank with notice that all debts or credits owing by the bank to “ J. E. Youtz, . . . E. B. Youtz, but belonging to Joshua E. Youtz, or either of them,” were attached. The bank made answer to the writ stating the fact as to the name in which the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hassie v. God is with Us CongregationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Redondo Beach Co. v. R. Cl BrewerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dwight A. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Hanna P. Ward v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Camp v. Oakland Mortgage & Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Houghton v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- City of Los Angeles v. KnappCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Continental National Bank v. StoltzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920