Legal Opinion
United States v. Earl G. Talkington
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 1979No. 77-3165PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Per curiam
Earl Talkington appeals from his conviction of making false statements to the Interstate Commerce Commission in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The indictment charged in a single count that Talkington had made seven false statements on a form filed with the ICC.
ICC form BOp 102 is part of a regulatory scheme which exempts agricultural cooperative associations from the licensing requirements imposed on most contract carriers. 49 U.S.C. § 303(b)(5). Under the present version of Section 203(b)(5) of the interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303(b)(5), a cooperative association must perform no more…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. CarmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Darrell Daniel Goldfine, United States of America v. Solomon Walter GoldfineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. William H. BeerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. William Tazwell EastCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Sam John DeepCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. George Vernon HansenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Jerome BerardiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Samuel Manarite and Jeanne ManariteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.