Legal Opinion
United States v. Sam John Deep
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1974No. 72-1623PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Deep appeals his conviction of five counts of an indictment charging him with violations of the Selective Service Law and of a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. The first, second, third and fifth counts, using different legal theories, essentially charged Deep with evading military service by knowingly making false representations to the Selective Service System that he was undergoing “active orthodontic treatment,” when in fact he was not.1
*1318Count four charged that during the period from April 13, 1971, to May 11, 1971, Deep knowingly failed “to report to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hopper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Thomas Curtis Bush v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- United States v. Arthur Benjamin MooreCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Michael E. GaudinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Christopher Village, L.P. And Wilshire Investments Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Luz Elena Valdez, United States of America v. Maria Guadalupe Lomeli-LomeliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Frank De RosaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,957 United States of America v. Luigi M. Di FonzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.