Legal Opinion

Oventrop v. Bi-State Development Agency

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1975No. 35903, 35904PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNN, Judge.

We consider cross appeals of plaintiff Emma June Oventrop and defendant Bi-State Development Agency arising out of injuries incurred by Mrs. Oventrop in two separate falls on Bi-State buses. Defendant-respondent James Hudson was alleged to have been the catalyst for Mrs. Oven-trop’s first fall. The appeals center on the trial court’s action in striking the testimony of a Bi-State driver and thereafter granting a new trial to Bi-State on the issue of liability on the basis that the trial court had erred in directing the testimony to be stricken. We affirm the trial court in part…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Skadal v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
  2. McConnell v. Pic-Walsh Freight CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Cook v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  4. Hamilton v. SloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Zipp v. Gasen's Drug Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1970

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Delaporte v. Robey Building Supply, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. McDowell v. Kawasaki Motors Corp. USAMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Edgewater Health Care, Inc. v. Health Systems Management, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Sloan v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API