Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Maron
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 22, 1958No. 14109PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WASHINGTON, Circuit Judge.
This case raises questions relative to “debt claims” by American citizens against alien property seized by the Government. The governing statute is Section 34(a) of the Trading With the Enemy Act, 60 Stat. 925 (1946), 50 U.S. C.A.Appendix § 34(a), which provides in pertinent part:
“No debt claim shall be allowed under this section if it was not due and owing at the time of such vesting * * *. Debt claims allowable hereunder shall include only those of citizens of the United States * * * [and certain others not here involved]. Legal representatives •» * or successors…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Blood v. . KaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Kaname Fujino v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. MarkhamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1946
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Cordero v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rogers v. MaronCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958