Legal Opinion

Utility Reform Project v. Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 2014No. UM1224; A143640PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

Pursuant to ORS 756.610(1), petitioners Utility Reform Project and Ken Lewis (collectively referred to as URP) seek judicial review of an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) denying URP’s request under ORS 757.259 to direct respondent Portland General Electric (PGE) to amortize certain deferred amounts into future rates. URP asserts that legislation passed in 2005 required the PUC to order PGE to refund amounts over-collected from ratepayers for taxes from October 5, 2005 to December 31, 2005, and that, in denying its request for amortization of the excess taxes collected, the PUC…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Don't Waste Oregon Committee v. Energy Facility Siting CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gearhart v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. Indus. Customers of Northwest Util. v. PucCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. BeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Utility Reform Project v. Oregon Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API