Legal Opinion

Ord v. Ord

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1893No. 14369PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, J.

This is an action of ejectment. Defendants had judgment, and plaintiffs appeal therefrom and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

It appears that in April, 1873, William Marcellus Ord, the common grantor of plaintiffs, and the defendant, Anna E. Ord, conveyed by deed of gift to plaintiffs, who are the minor children of his brother, John S. Ord, certain property in Santa Cruz County commonly known as the “ Ord rancho,” and which contained about one hundred and sixty acres, including the property in controversy. By the same deed he granted and confirmed to his sister, Mrs.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Dean v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gulf Red Cedar Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Bollinger v. BollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Piercy v. PiercyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Mower v. MowerUtah Supreme Court · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API