State ex rel. Shane v. New Philadelphia Police Department
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
We hold today that a criminal defendant may not obtain a writ of mandamus under R.C. 149.43 to secure public records when he may litigate his right to obtain these records in his criminal case. Hence, we conclude the court of appeals correctly denied Shane’s complaint for a writ of mandamus.
In State, ex rel. Scanlon, v. Deters (1989) , 45 Ohio St. 3d 376, 544 N.E. 2d 680, paragraph one of the syllabus, we held: “A relator in a mandamus action seeking production of documents pursuant to R.C. 149.43 is required, as are relators in other mandamus actions, to show the absence of an adequate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Scanlon v. DetersOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Henneman v. City of ToledoOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. McGee v. Ohio State Board of PsychologyOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Hastings Mutual Insurance v. MerillatOhio Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- State ex rel. Steffen v. KraftOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- State ex rel. McGowan v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State ex rel. Coleman v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- City of Chillicothe v. KnightOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Jenkins v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.