Legal Opinion
Meadowdale Neighborhood Committee v. City of Edmonds
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided September 15, 1980No. 8466-6-IPublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSwanson, J.
In this action by the plaintiffs Donald Coffin and Meadowdale Neighborhood Committee (hereinafter Meadowdale), challenging approval by the City of Edmonds of a Planned Residential Development (PRD), the principal issue is whether service of process on the secretary to the mayor complies with RCW 4.28.080(2). For the reasons that follow, we hold it does not.
Application for approval of the PRD was made on May 3, 1978. Listed as applicant and designer was respondent David Kinderfather. The property owner was shown to be Sierra West Construction Company. An environmental checklist was submitted…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. O'CONNELLWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Finch v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Thayer v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Veradale Valley Citizens' Planning Committee v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Town of Othello v. HarderWashington Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sarkissian v. Chicago Board of EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Union Bay Pres. Coal. v. COSMOS DEVELOP.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
- French v. GabrielWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Nitardy v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Foothills Development Co. v. Clark County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.