Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Salem, Ohio

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 5, 2004No. 03-3399PublishedCited by 289 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

378 F.3d 566

Jimmie L. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF SALEM, OHIO, Thomas Eastek, Walter Greenamyer, Brooke Zellers, Larry D. DeJane, James A. Armeni, Joseph Julian, and Harry Dugan, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 03-3399.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Argued: March 19, 2004.

Decided and Filed August 5, 2004.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Economus, J.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by289 opinions

  1. Donna Randolph v. Ohio Department of Youth ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
  2. Whitaker ex rel. Whitaker v. Kenosha Unified School District No. 1 Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  3. John Doe v. Miami Univ.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  4. James Dixon, Jr. v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General and Robert S. Mueller, Iii, Fbi DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Philecia Barnes v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

284 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API