Legal Opinion

Nuculovic v. Hill

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 2010No. Docket No. 280216PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilder, J.

Plaintiff appeals as of right the trial court’s grant of summary disposition in favor of defendants. We affirm.

In September 2005, plaintiff was driving a vehicle north on Harper Avenue, at an intersection with a highway entrance ramp, when defendant Johnny D. Hill, driving a bus owned by defendant SMART Bus, Inc. (SMART), turned left in front of her vehicle, causing a collision. Plaintiff sued defendants in 2006, more than 60 days after the accident, alleging injuries resulting from the negligence of defendants.

Defendants moved for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(7), (8), and (10), on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Booth Newspapers, Inc v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Tebo v. HavlikMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Coates v. Bastian Brothers, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. CAM Construction v. Lake Edgewood Condominium Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Mettler Walloon, LLC v. Melrose TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Clay v. DoeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. In re GachMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Allstate Insurance Co v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  4. Lawrence Russell v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Atkins v. Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 2012

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API