Legal Opinion

Lawrence Russell v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 2017No. 332934PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

In this action related to an injury arising from a purportedly defective city street, defendant, the city of Detroit (the City) sought summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7) on the ground that plaintiff, Lawrence Russell, had failed to provide notice in compliance with the government tort liability Act (GTLA), MCL 691.1401 et seq . The trial court denied the City's motion, and the City now appeals as of right. Because plaintiff provided notice to the City as required by MCL 691.1404(1), we affirm.

According to plaintiff's complaint, on July 20, 2014, he fractured his leg after he…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Rowland v. Washtenaw County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nawrocki v. MacOmb County Road CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Trentadue v. Buckler Automatic Lawn Sprinkler CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 2007
  4. McCAHAN v. BRENNANMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Whitman v. City of BurtonMichigan Supreme Court · 2013

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ass'n of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Mich. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, Consumers Energy Co. (In Re For)Michigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. ALLEN v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020
  3. Bailey & Biddle LLC v. City of St JosephMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. David Sanders v. Shawn SpohnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. David Sanders v. Shawn SpohnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API