Legal Opinion

Clay v. Doe

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 2015No. Docket 321008PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals the trial court’s order that granted summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(7). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

While boarding a Suburban Mobility Authority for Regional Transportation (SMART) bus on April 18, 2011, plaintiff slipped and fell on the wet floor of the bus aisle. Thereafter, he filed a claim for no-fault benefits from SMART’S insurance administrator, which received the claim on July 5, 2011, 78 days after plaintiff was injured. Almost two years later, on March 20, 2013, plaintiff filed a complaint against defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pohutski v. City of Allen ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Wilson v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Diamond v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Nuculovic v. HillMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. People v. QuinnMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims PlanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Arthur Krumm v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Beckman Holdings Inc v. Sunnyside Resort Condominium Assn IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Candi Ottgen v. Abdalmaijid Katranji MdMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Darrel Dusendang v. Chris L RuggMichigan Court of Appeals · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API