Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Korpa

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 10, 1993No. 90-1545-L-1; CA A74211PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment for defendant. ORCP 47C. The questions presented are whether plaintiffs’ medical malpractice claims are barred by either issue preclusion or judicial estoppel, and whether the court erred when it excluded evidence pre-trial. We reverse.

According to the summary judgment record, defendant, who was plaintiff Bill Marshall’s 1 physician, prescribed certain medications to treat headaches. Plaintiff, who worked as a log truck driver, asked defendant whether the medication could affect his ability to drive and was told that it would not. Plaintiff took the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Bakker v. Baza'r, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Chavez v. Boise Cascade CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. PitzerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. Patterson v. KannaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  4. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Snow Mountain Pine, Ltd. v. Tecton Laminates Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API