Legal Opinion

Patterson v. Kanna

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 19, 1994No. 91-02329CV; CA A75513PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this foreclosure action, defendant appeals from a summary judgment for plaintiffs. ORCP 47C. We reverse.

To prevail on its motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs must show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Seeborg v. General Motors Corporation, 284 Or 695, 700, 588 P2d 1100 (1978). We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Tolbert v. First National Bank, 312 Or 485, 494, 823 P2d 965 (1991).

In 1983, plaintiffs loaned defendant $28,000. Defendant executed a promissory note to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeborg v. General Motors CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Tolbert v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Caplener v. United States National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Hampton Tree Farms, Inc. v. JewettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. Marshall v. KorpaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. HaasYamhill County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API