Legal Opinion

Floyd v. Hornbeck

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1931No. Civil No. 3049PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

George Hornbeck and Mary E. Hornbeck, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, brought suit in the superior court of Maricopa county against L. B. Floyd and Maelda Floyd, his wife, hereinafter called defendants, setting up in substance that they were the owners in fee simple of certain real estate situated in Maricopa county; that they had entered into a written agreement with defendants for the exchange of said real estate for lands alleged by defendants to be owned by the latter; that the exchange was conditioned upon certain representations made by defendants as to their land; that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Wooster v. ScorseArizona Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Dale v. HunnemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Frame v. MahoneyArizona Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Kinney v. NeisArizona Supreme Court · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bates v. MitchellArizona Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Michener v. Standard Accident InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mosher v. ConwayArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lockwood v. MattinglyArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Neyens v. DonatoArizona Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API