Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Mattingly

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1964No. 7452PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCRUGGS, Justice.

The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants as they appeared in the lower court.

The plaintiff sued the defendants to recover a real estate commission for the sale of the community property of the defendants. The case was tried to the lower court sitting without a jury. From the judgment, and from the order denying the motion for a new trial, defendants bring this appeal. The sole question presented by the assignments of error is whether the community can be held liable for the judgment recovered below.

Since there is no reported transcript available, owing to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hall v. WeatherfordArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Eason v. HeightonArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Floyd v. HornbeckArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Wilson v. MethenyArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Phoenix Airport Travelodge v. DolginCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  2. V. J. Doyle Plumbing Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  3. Management Clearing, Inc. v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API