Legal Opinion

State v. . Ledford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 1932PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

As tbe verdict of the jury was not recorded in the Superior Court, though conceded by counsel for defendant to have been returned “Guilty of manslaughter,” it would be necessary to remand the cause for correction of the record (S. v. Brown, ante, 513), but for an error, presently appearing, which requires that the bill of indictment be quashed or the action abated. S. v. Crowder, 193 N. C., 130, 136 S. E., 337; S. v. Branch, 68 N. C., 186.

It appears from the record that on 2 May, 1932, the solicitor sent a bill to the grand jury, in which it was charged the defendant “wilfully and feloniously…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . BranchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. State v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. State v. . CrowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API