State v. Thomas
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtEbvim, J.
Tbe defendant asserts tbat bis conviction and sentence in tbe Superior Court are invalid because be was tried upon tbe original warrant rather than upon an indictment found by a grand jury.
'When tbe representatives of tbe freemen of North Carolina met in convention at Halifax in 1776 to frame a constitution for tbe newly born state, they knew bow grossly the English Crown bad abused its legal power to prosecute its subjects upon informations preferred by its prosecuting attorneys without tbe intervention of a grand jury. S. v. Ledford, 203 N.C. 724, 166 S.E. 917; S. v. Guilford, 49 N.C. 83.…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- State v. Lytle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
- Lewis v. . Commissioners of WakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
- State v. HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- State v. . BarkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . BeamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952