Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 29, 1922No. 22,809PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The record is lengthy as the trial occupied two weeks, and it may conduce to brevity and clearness to mention first some of the undisputed facts in the order in which they occurred.
In the latter part of August, 1920, Marguerette Z. Craighead employed the Sheridan, Sweeney & Kerst Detective Agency to shadow her husband, A. W. Craighead, and an operator named Lawrence E. Tatro was detailed to perform this service.
*170Tatro found Craighead and William E. Stonebraker riding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Markham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- People v. Ah BeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. RenswickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mundy v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- State v. GleasonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Tipton v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- State v. PrayNevada Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.