Mullinnix v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Appeal from the County Court of Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. M. B. Harris, County Judge. Appeal from a conviction of pursuing the occupation of a photographer without having first paid the tax and procured a license therefor; penalty, a fine of $15. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
HENDERSON, Judge.
Apellant was convicted of pursuing the occupation of a photographer without first having paid the tax and pro.curing a license therefor. His punishment was assessed at a fine of $15, and he appeals.
The following are the facts proven: “That defendant was the agent and representative of a photograph gallery in Dallas County, Texas, and as snch representative was, on November 4, 1898, in said Tarrant County, taking photographs of houses, and offering the same for sale, and soliciting business for said gallery, in said Dallas County, and had paid no license or occupation tax in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ex Parte HolmanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Western Co. v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Pierce v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Lone Star Motor Import, Inc. v. Citroen Cars CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.