Hanzal v. City of San Antonio
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtEly, C. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Thirty-Seventh district court, sustaining exceptions to the petition and denying a temporary writ of injunction to a number of persons describing themselves as “actively engaged in a mechanical pursuit or occupation, to wit, that of a barber,” who are attacking the validity of an ordinance passed by the city, which is for the regulation of “barber shops and the trade or occupation of barbering,” and who desired to restrain the enforcement of the ordinance until the cause can be heard on its merits.
Section 99 of the charter of the city of San Antonio…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thorpe v. Rutland & Burlington RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Coleman v. RhoneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Gerard v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Hoff v. StateSuperior Court of Delaware · 1938
- Leach v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- City of San Antonio v. Robert Thompson & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.