Legal Opinion

Hawke v. California Realty & Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1915No. Civ. No. 1359PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Praneiseo and from an order denying a new trial. J. J. Trahucco, Judge, presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

The plaintiff brought this action for the purpose of obtaining a decree declaring her to he entitled to a vendor’s lien on the certain real estate specifically described in the complaint and for the foreclosure of such lien.

The answer set up a prior lien in favor of the defendants, Sargent and Anna E. McLennan, upon said real property, which lien was duly recorded in the office of the county recorder of the city and county of San Francisco, wherein said real estate is situated, and asked that in case it he adjudged that the plaintiff has á vendor’s lien upon the property do- scribed in her…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Tarke v. BinghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Tillaux v. TillauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Underhill v. Santa Barbara Land, Building, & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Prouty v. DevinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Certain Parcels of Land SituateDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1949
  2. Mann v. MannNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Gantner & Mattern Co. v. HawkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. Ferguson v. FergusonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  5. Pellerito v. DragnaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API