Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1943No. Civ. No. 12394 First Dist., DivPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment dismissing their complaint as to defendants Knight, Boland, Riordan, Kilmartin, Radii, Lillian Ostrander and John Harkins, following the sustaining of demurrers interposed by these defendants to their complaint.

The complaint was in two counts. The first count is directed only against certain other defendants, Ferguson, Sloan and White. As to these three defendants it is alleged in the first count that they are heirs of one Emma Eleanor Ferguson White, who died in 1937, and that plaintiffs are likewise heirs of such decedent. It is further…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Crew v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Bell v. PleasantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. TorreganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Gerlach v. SchultzIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Firato v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ehret v. IchiokaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Etchegoyen v. Hamill (In Re Farmer's Market)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API