Van Benschoten v. Fales
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ionia; Davis, J. Replevin by Harvey ,L. Van Benschoten and George W. Harris against Elmer E. Fales. From a judgment for plaintiffs on verdict directed by the court, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
The defendant is a deputy sheriff for Ionia county, and on the 29th day of July, 1899, at the city of Belding, levied an attachment upon the goods in controversy in favor of Henry Stern and Gotthilf Bloch, copartners, doing business under the firm name of Stern '& Bloch, and against John V. Cahill and William Hudson, copartners, doing business at Belding, Mich., under the firm name of Cahill & Hudson. The writ issued' on the 27th day of July, 1899, and was made returnable on the 5th day of September following. A proper inventory and appraisal of the goods was made on the date of the *178levy. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Barber v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Emerson v. Detroit Steel & Spring Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Maxon v. PerrottMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Pack, Woods & Co. v. American Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. RunnellsMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Buscaino v. RhodesMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
- Schoenfeld v. BourneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972