Legal Opinion

Smith v. Runnells

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1893PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Trover.- Defendant brings error. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff, claiming to be the owner by purchase from Robinson & Blodgett, copartners, of certain mill machinery, brings trover for its conversion. Tbe defendant attempts to justify bis conversion by virtue of *618his office of sheriff, having sold the goods upon an execution. TJpon the trial he offered in evidence the files and entries in the case wherein the execution issued, which proof was excluded by the trial court upon plaintiff’s objection. The propriety of this ruling is the only question raised by the record.

That action was begun by attachment, and the affidavit is said to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wright v. WilsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rickman v. RickmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Elliotte v. LavierMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Rood v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Van Benschoten v. FalesMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Lamb v. LambMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API