Schoenfeld v. Bourne
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Gratiot; Searl, J. Attachment proceedings by Fred Schoenfeld against Benjamin W. Bourne and William H. Denton. A judgment quashing the writ is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff is a resident of Ohio. The *140defendants reside in the Republic of Mexico. Plaintiff proceeded against the defendants in the circuit court for the county of Gratiot, by attachment, by reason of the nonresidence of the defendants. The writ issued July 10, 1908. Plaintiff attempted to publish a notice of attachment, but in the published notice named the defendants as “B. W. Bourne and William H. Dunton.” On October 15, 1908, an affidavit of publication was filed, made by one of the publishers of the Gratiot Journal, stating therein that the notice annexed thereto had been published…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Millar v. BabcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Reading v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Hubner v. ReickhoffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Fanning v. KrapflSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- King v. HarringtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Goodspeed v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Nichols v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Guaranty Abstract Co. v. RelfCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Elstermeyer v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Sinclair v. AlfordSupreme Court of Florida · 1954