Legal Opinion

Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. City of Memphis

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 3, 1955Published

1Opinion of the CourtBejach, J.

The parties will be styled as in the lower court, complainant and defendants, the complainant being the appellant in this court, and the defendants, appellees here.

The sole question involved in this cause is whether or not complainant is liable for the privilege tax levied against automobile dealers, in addition to the privilege tax or license paid for engaging in its principal business, viz., that of purchasing notes secured by conditional sales *694contracts, principally upon automobiles, and lending money npon notes secured by chattel mortgages. This particular suit seeks to recover the total…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trentham v. MooreTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wender v. LobertiniTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Commercial Standard Ins. v. HixsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Neuhoff Packing Co. v. City of ChattanoogaTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Shelton v. SilverfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API