Shelton v. Silverfield
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Davidson County. J. W. Bonner, J.
1Opinion of the Court
W. L. Grigsby, Sp. J.
In tlie first of tlie above styled cases the defendants in error, Silverfield & Eeldman, are pawnbrokers in the city of Nashville, and as such have paid the pawnbrokers’ privilege tax required by the Act of 1899, and were regularly licensed to do business as such. JBy an agreed statement of facts — that is, facts set out in petition of defendants in error for certiorari and supersedeas, it is shown that the regular course and practice of the business engaged in by the defendants in error is to loan money on articles pawned as security therefor, and 'to sell such articles…
2Cited by7 opinions
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Foster & Creighton Co. v. GrahamTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
- Wilson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- State v. Winehill & RosenthalSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
- Securities Inv. Co. v. CobbTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.