Legal Opinion

Boeck v. Katz Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 11, 1942No. 35,602PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This is an action by a minor by his next friend to recover damages alleged to have been sustained when a prescription for eserine was filled by one of the defendants with atropine and the atropine was used in the minor’s eyes according to the doctor’s prescription. Judgment was for the plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

After setting out the address of the parties and the incorporation of one of the defendants and that Breidenthal was employed by the company, the petition alleged that on August 31, 1935, plaintiff received a prescription for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Leinbach v. Pickwick-Greyhound LinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  3. Thomas v. DansbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Federal Betterment Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  5. Kansas City, Fort Scott & Gulf Railroad v. KierSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomsen v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Collingwood v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API