Legal Opinion

Thomsen v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1965No. Civ. 22286PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRAY, J. *

— Defendants, Rexall Drug and Chemical Company, and J. Mock, appeal from judgment after jury trial in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $75,000 1 the orders denying motion for nonsuit, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and motion for new trial.* 2

Question Presented

Solely, the sufficiency of the evidence.

Record

The complaint charged negligence and breach of warranty in the filling of a certain prescription by defendants. A jury brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $75,000 as damages for plaintiff’s injuries resulting from her taking an erroneous prescription.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Torres v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Allen v. SundeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Barton v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. Maupin v. WidlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API