Thomsen v. Rexall Drug & Chemical Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BRAY, J. *
— Defendants, Rexall Drug and Chemical Company, and J. Mock, appeal from judgment after jury trial in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $75,000 1 the orders denying motion for nonsuit, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and motion for new trial.* 2
Question Presented
Solely, the sufficiency of the evidence.
Record
The complaint charged negligence and breach of warranty in the filling of a certain prescription by defendants. A jury brought in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $75,000 as damages for plaintiff’s injuries resulting from her taking an erroneous prescription.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gottsdanker v. Cutter LaboratoriesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Vaccarezza v. SanguinettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Gall v. Union Ice CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Mitchell v. GonzalesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Allen v. SundeanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Barton v. OwenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Maupin v. WidlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.