Legal Opinion

Jamul Action Committee v. Dept. of Interior

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 29, 2023No. 2:22-cv-02148Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Jamul Action Committee, No. 2:22-cv-02148-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. Department of the Interior, Office of Indian 15 Gaming, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 For the reasons explained in this order, the Jamul Action Committee’s complaint is 19 | dismissed without leave to amend for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a 20 | claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 21 | I. BACKGROUND 22 In some circumstances, Federal law permits high-stakes gambling on Indian…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API