Legal Opinion

Polett, M., Aplt. v. Public Communications Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 27, 2015No. 18 EAP 2014PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice TODD.

Appellants Margo and Daniel Polett appeal from an order of the Superior Court vacating a judgment for injuries sustained by Margo Polett after she underwent knee replacement surgery during which she received an artificial knee manufactured by Appellee Zimmer, Inc., and, thereafter, appeared in a promotional video produced and filmed by co-Appellee Public Communications, Inc. (“PCI”). Upon review, we reverse the order of the Superior Court and remand to that tribunal to consider the question of whether the trial court erred in refusing to remit the jury’s compensatory…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Grady v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Gill, R., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  2. Stange, T. v. Janssen PharmaceuticalsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Bayview Loan Servicing LLC v. WickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Rutter's, Inc. v. Ritchey, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Rutter's, Inc. v. Ritchey, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API