Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Heffelfinger v. Brunner

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2007No. 2007-1908PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} This is an expedited election case for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to, among other things, certify a referendum petition as sufficient and to place the law being challenged by the petition on the November 6, 2007 election ballot. Because relators have not established either a clear legal right to the requested extraordinary relief or a corresponding clear legal duty on the part of the secretary of state to provide it, we deny the writ.

{¶ 2} On May 22, 2007, the General Assembly enacted Sub.S.B. No. 16 (“S.B. 16”), which became law without the governor’s approval.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State ex rel. Steele v. MorrisseyOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Thurn v. Cuyahoga County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Whitman v. Hamilton County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Sapp v. Franklin County Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State ex rel. Husted v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. Colvin v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. State ex rel. LetOhioVote.org v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Husted v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2009

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API