Legal Opinion
Ascolese v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 2, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-1461PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
This action was brought by Lisa Ascolese, who was at the time of the events at issue a police officer for the Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (hereinafter “SEPTA”). The defendants include SEPTA itself and various SEPTA employees, sued in their official and individual capacities (Dr. Louis van de Beek, Judith Pierce, Richard J. Evans, and Ronald Sharpe). The defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment, seeking the dismissal, on a variety of grounds, of all of the claims made by plaintiff Lisa Ascolese. For the reasons that…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- DeJoy v. Comcast Cable Communications Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Kohn v. AT & T CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Anderson v. Deluxe Homes of PA, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Momah v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.