Legal Opinion
Kohn v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 21, 1999No. CIV. A. 99-102(AJL)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by plaintiff Samuel Kohn (“Kohn”) against New Jersey defendants AT & T Corp. (“AT & T”), The WorldPartners Company (“WPC”), Bruce Leasure (“Leasure”) and Kamie Zaracki (“Zaracki”)(collectively, the “Defendants”). In an amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”), filed on 21 January 1999, Kohn alleges violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (“Title VII”), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-l, et seq., the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq., the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited104 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Santiago v. City of VinelandDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- DeSantis v. New Jersey TransitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Mann v. Estate of MeyersDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Hook v. Georgia-Gulf Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Mosley v. Bay Ship Management, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.