Legal Opinion
Momah v. Albert Einstein Medical Center
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1997No. 2:94-cv-07043PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This civil action has been brought before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Following careful consideration of the record and for the reasons set forth in the following paragraphs, we conclude that summary judgment is appropriately entered in defendants’ favor on all of plaintiffs claims.
HISTORY OF THE CASE
In June, 1992 Plaintiff, who is a black man of nigerian national origin, was hired by the Albert Einstein Medical Center as a third year resident in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. (Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, ¶…
2Cases cited62 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mroczek v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Puchalski v. School District of SpringfieldDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Lin v. Rohm and Haas Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- McCusker v. Hibu PLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Cauley, M.D., Ph.D. v. Geisinger ClinicDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.