Legal Opinion
DeJoy v. Comcast Cable Communications Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 8, 1996No. Civil Action 96-1135 (AJL)PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION'
LECHNER, District Judge.
This is an action by Frank DeJoy (“DeJoy”) against Comcast Cable Communications, Inc. (“Comcast Cable”), Suburban Cablevision (“Suburban Cablevision”), Comcast Cable of New Jersey, Thomas Baxter (“Baxter”) and Michael Doyle (“Doyle”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). The amended complaint (the “Amended Complaint”) asserts claims, arising from the termination of DeJoy’s employment with Suburban Cable, pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”) 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.; the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.; the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Marrero v. Camden County Board of Social ServicesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Cortes v. University of Medicine & Dentistry of New JerseyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- DeSantis v. New Jersey TransitDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- DiMaria Const., Inc. v. InterarchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
- Farris v. County of CamdenDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.