Legal Opinion
Dutch v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 2010No. 07-CM-1205PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEADMAN, Senior Judge:
Appellant Antoine Dutch appeals his conviction at a bench trial for attempted uttering; namely, cashing a forged check. His principal challenge on appeal is to the introduction as “business records” of two documents derived from information stored on computers. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
The evidence presented to the trial court evidenced the following. On April 5, 2005, a customer walked into Malcolm Liquors and approached the store’s check-cashing station. Working at the check-cashing station was the store’s owner at the time, Houng Hoon Seo, who testified at trial.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- David H. Rosenberg, Trustee in Bankruptcy v. Charles E. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Conoco Inc. (Formerly Continental Oil Co.) v. Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Patton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Dyno Construction Company v. McWane Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Antoine Mayhand v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- The People v. ZavalaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Paul Anthony Ashby, Keith Logan, and Merle Vernon Watson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2019
- Bynum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.