Legal Opinion
Dyno Construction Company v. McWane Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1999No. 98-4050PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Dyno Construction Company, sued Defendant, McWane, Inc., alleging various breach of contract claims arising out of Dyno’s purchase of ductile iron pipe from McWane that was later found to be defective. The district court denied the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, and a jury returned a general verdict in favor of McWane. The district court denied Dyno’s motion for a new trial. Dyno appeals the order denying its motion for summary judgment, the judgment entered after trial, and the order denying Dyno’s motion for a new trial. We find no error…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Linda Holmes v. City of Massillon, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sheila L. Logan v. Dayton Hudson Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation Kellermeyer Building Services, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James Harrison HathawayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Zayre Corporation v. S.M. & R. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Helle v. Landmark, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. Luis Salgado (99-5645) Wilfredo Jambu (99-5651)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Candy JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Steven L. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- The Walter E. Campbell Company v. United States Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- Audio Visual Associates, Incorporated, T/a Ritz Audio Visual Associates, Incorporated v. Sharp Electronics Corporation, and Douglas Stewart CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.