Bruno v. Elitzky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
PAPADAKOS, Justice.
Appellants seek reversal of a sanction order imposed on them by the trial court for failing to answer interrogatories. Review by this tribunal was granted both in order to examine the relationship between state and local rules of civil procedure and, as well, because we felt a particular need to inquire (improvidently so, we now believe) into an *49action in which the Appellee is a sitting judge in this Commonwealth.
Appellants are defendants in a libel suit. On January 19, 1984, they were served with a set of nine interrogatories seeking the facts and law…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Grota v. LaBoccettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
3Cited by26 opinions
- Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- French v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Christian v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. KmetzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.