Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Elitzky

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 9, 1987No. 86 E.D. Appeal Docket 1986PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

PAPADAKOS, Justice.

Appellants seek reversal of a sanction order imposed on them by the trial court for failing to answer interrogatories. Review by this tribunal was granted both in order to examine the relationship between state and local rules of civil procedure and, as well, because we felt a particular need to inquire (improvidently so, we now believe) into an *49action in which the Appellee is a sitting judge in this Commonwealth.

Appellants are defendants in a libel suit. On January 19, 1984, they were served with a set of nine interrogatories seeking the facts and law…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Grota v. LaBoccettaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kerns v. Methodist HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. French v. United Parcel ServiceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Christian v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims PlanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. KmetzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API