Legal Opinion
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Kmetz
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 5, 1989No. 488 Misc. Dkt. 4PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, Judge.
Appellees, 1 George and Victoria Kmetz, instituted this action against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation (Department), to recover damages resulting from the continual collapse of the roadway in front of the appellees’ home. The action was commenced by writ of summons on March 17, 1988, and, after being ruled to do so, appellees served and filed their complaint on May 23, 1988. Appellees’ complaint was endorsed with a notice to defend pursuant to Pa.R.C.P. 1018.1. The Department’s answer and new matter to the complaint was filed on June 27,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Pennsylvania Dental Ass'n v. Commonwealth Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Sweener v. First Baptist Church of EmporiumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Adcox v. PA. MFGRS'ASSN. CAS. INS. CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Spirit of the Avenger Ministries v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. AndrewsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Contact II, Inc. v. Pennsylvania State Horse Racing CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. Urban Redevelopment AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.