Legal Opinion
Richard James Booth v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 24, 1993No. 92-5134PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Richard James Booth commenced this action in the United States Court of Federal Claims 1 alleging the breach-of an employment contract with the United States. The Court of Federal Claims denied the Government’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Booth v. United States, No. 91-1456C (Fed.Cl. Apr. 28, 1992). The trial court, however, converted the Government’s motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment and found in favor of the Government. Id. Because the Court of Federal Claims lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review Mr. Booth’s…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Louise J. Hamlet v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Gay v. WallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Fanning, Phillips and Molnar v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Martinez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Stinson, Lyons & Bustamante, P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- Chicago Milwaukee Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.